Wasn’t able to do my planned #DU writeup this weekend because of computer issues. Will try to do it Monday or Tuesday, before Alcorn game.
RT @BCSisBS: BE 7-5 champ: Pitt beats WVU then loses to Cincy, or for UConn: Pitt loses both remaining games, WVU loses to Rutgers, and UConn goes 1-1
RT @ewerickson: Prediction: Within the next 48 hours the TSA will ban all videoing of airport security check points as a “security concern.” #RSRH
The Pac-10, thanks largely to the USC situation, could potentially end up with 3 bowl-eligible teams, and five (!) teams with 5-7 records.
RT @RapidsSoccer: Your Colorado Rapids win!! MLS Cup Champions!!
LSU is less qualified to be ranked in the Top 5 than Sarah Palin is to be president.
Hey, look! It’s an actual blog post (not a tweet) by me (not a guestblogger) about college football (not University of Denver basketball)! WHEEE!!! And it has a nerdy, Harry Potter-themed, SAT analogy-based title!
About that title… what I mean is not that TCU is the personification of good and Stanford the personification of evil (although…), but rather that, in all likelihood, “neither can live while the other survives,” BCS-wise, between the Horned Frogs and the Drunken Trees. Which means that, contrary to David’s confident assertion that the Trees “just need to take care of business against the Beavers next weekend and odds are they are BCS bound,” I believe there is still a substantial likelihood that 11-1 Stanford will go to the Alamo Bowl. And if they don’t, then TCU gets screwed.
Allow me to explain.
RT @ConanOBrien: TLC announced that ratings for “Sarah Palin’s Alaska” are much bigger than the show it replaced, “Joe Lieberman’s Connecticut.”
RT @slmandel: New BCS standings: 1) Ore .9764, 2) Aub .9682, 3) TCU .8995, 4) Boise .8860, 5) LSU .8193, 6) Stan .7763, 7) Wis. .7688, 8) Oh St .7148
