Decaying UARS satellite could hit U.S. (but probably won’t)

[NOTE: For the latest, follow @UARS_Reentry on Twitter.]

NASA’s Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, better known as “UARS,” will soon crash back to Earth in an uncontrolled re-entry. NASA previously thought this would happen this afternoon, which meant North America was seemingly out of the woods. But according to an update this morning, the satellite’s descent has slowed, and re-entry is now expected late tonight or early tomorrow, Eastern Daylight Time. The Aerospace Corporation’s Center for Orbital and Reentry Debris Studies is currently predicting a re-entry time of 11:16 PM Eastern — plus or minus five hours.

Because the satellite orbits the globe every 90 minutes or so, that broad range of uncertainty (which will narrow as we get closer to crashdown/splashdown) means a whole lot of land and ocean is potentially in its path. Specifically:

1991063b

So the odds are, it won’t hit the U.S., or anywhere near the U.S. But it could! And so, let’s get a little parochial. Here’s an UNOFFICIAL map that I created, using this map from The Weather Space as my starting point, then adding APPROXIMATE times (based on data from Heavens Above and the above map by the Aerospace Corporation), showing ROUGHLY the time windows when UARS will be passing near or over the U.S. tonight, if it stays aloft long enough to reach each of these arcs in its orbit:

UARS over US

As you can see, if it re-enters a half-hour earlier than its predicted ~11:16 PM EDT time, or an hour later (or 2 hours earlier, or 2 1/2 hours later), it could be over or near the U.S. or Canada.

And now, to get even more parochial… if the timing is juuuuust right, it might be visible from Denver!

PassGTrackLargeGraphic.aspx

That’s from Heavens Above. The dotted line means the satellite will be in Earth’s shadow (which is another way of saying we’ll be long past sunset when it flies over), so it won’t be visible unless it’s in the process of re-entering the atmosphere. But if that happens to be the case, it’ll be awesome!

I’m crossing my fingers — the odds of satellite pieces injuring anyone or causing serious damage is very, very low, even if it does come in over land, because the vast majority of land area is unpopulated. However, as I mentioned yesterday, the odds of a spectacular light show are high, if UARS re-enters in an area where it’s visible:

As the satellite descends to an altitude of about 50 miles (80 kilometers), friction with the atmosphere is converted to light and heat. As it moves on a relatively slow – one could almost use the adjective “majestic” – flight across the sky, what is usually seen is a long trail of light and sparks that can take on virtually every color of the rainbow.

Small chunks of the satellite may be seen to break off and trail behind the main body. (NASA expects up to 26 pieces from UARS to survive re-entry and reach the ground.) If the re-entry occurs at night, it could light up the sky with a brilliance that easily rivals the full moon. Even if it occurs during the daytime, the satellite’s fiery passage across the sky could be readily seen.

Notes veteran satellite watcher Kevin Fetter: “A nice sized [satellite] with a uncontrolled re-entry. What a nice light show it should put on, if the decay occurs where people can see it.”

Can I get an 10:50 PM Eastern Time (8:50 PM Mountain Time) re-entry? LET’S MAKE THIS HAPPEN, PEOPLE!

Dan Beebe resigns; Fake Beebe erupts

      Comments Off on Dan Beebe resigns; Fake Beebe erupts

As expected, Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe resigned today as part of the latest effort to save the Big 12. This caused the most hilarious account on Twitter, Fake Dan Beebe — the funniest fake tweeter since @MayorEmanuel and his pet duck Quaxelrod disappeared into the motherf***ing time portal — to go out in an absolute blaze of glory, one that can only be described as epic, or as David put it, #WINNING.

After the jump, for posterity, the entire, hourlong Fake Dan Beebe rant, in chronological order. Warning: salty language and anatomical references.

Continue reading

Incredible video of aurora from ISS

      2 Comments on Incredible video of aurora from ISS

A true must-see:

NASA: “Video of the Aurora Australis taken by the crew of Expedition 29 on board the International Space Station. This sequence of shots was taken September 17, 2011 from 17:22:27 to 17:45:12 GMT, on an ascending pass from south of Madagascar to just north of Australia over the Indian Ocean.”

Dr. Jeff Masters: “The rippling green curtains of the aurora as the space station zooms overhead are amazing!”

SpaceWeather.com: “Note how the underbelly of the space station glows green from the reflected light of the auroras below. Also, in the distance, Sirius the dog star and Orion the Hunter can be seen rising feet-first into the night sky.”

In other orbital news, here’s the latest from NASA on the “UARS” satellite that’s tumbling toward an uncontrolled re-entry. It’s now expected to crash/splash down sometime tomorrow during the afternoon EDT, but it won’t hit North America. Where exactly it will hit remains uncertain. NASA says that, because Earth is still quite sparsely populated in the grand scheme of things (and most of its surface is water), there’s “only” a 1-in-3,200 of a piece of the satellite causing human casualties. (I’ve seen this misreported as “your chance” of being hit, but of course that’s wrong — the odds of any individual person being hit are 1-in-something-trillion.)

That said, if the satellite’s path during re-entry takes it over a populated area, the light show will be quite spectacular:

Continue reading

Conferencepocalypse NOT!

      5 Comments on Conferencepocalypse NOT!

YAAAAAAAAAAY!!!!!!! The Pac-16 is dead! The Pac-16 is dead! The Pac-16 is dead!

USC, still in Boulder every other year! WOOHOO!!! Victory!!!

Larry Scott has decided to pull the plug on negotiations with Texas & co., apparently deeming that it wasn’t worth all the hassles and problems expansion was going to entail. Undoubtedly we’ll learn more about exactly what transpired in the coming hours and days, but bottom line, the Pac-12 is sticking at 12. This led to the hilarious spectacle of Oklahoma’s president implausibly trying to pretend that the Sooners totally didn’t want an invite from Scott’s stupid conference invite anyway. As one tweeter aptly put it, “OU ‘decided not to apply’ [to the Pac-12] for the same reason I’ve ‘decided not to ask Jessica Alba on a date’.”

This news follows on the heels of reports earlier Tuesday that a last-ditch effort to save the Big 12 was — again — underway, with Oklahoma making various demands, including the ouster of commissioner Dan Beebe, in return for its agreement to stay. As it turns out, not surprisingly, this feverish effort happened because the Big 12 schools knew that the Pac-12 had decided not to expand. So now it’ll likely be the Big 12 (Minus 3) expanding, to 10 or perhaps back to 12. Specifically, there’s word a BYU invite may be imminent. There’s also talk of Air Force or TCU or Louisville or West Virginia (rejected earlier today by the SEC and ACC).

Meanwhile, with Missouri apparently staying put in the Big 12, and with the ACC having previously marked its teams seemingly pretty much off-limits, the question arises: who the heck is the SEC’s 14th team? They can’t stay at 13 forever; the math doesn’t work, the scheduling is a nightmare, the divisions are impossible. But who do they add, if not Virginia Tech (ACC) or Florida State (ACC, and vetoed by Florida anyway) or Missouri (see above) or West Virginia (who they rejected today) or Louisville (vetoed by Kentucky)? Uh, Cincinnati?!? TCU?!? If all their options are subpar and would reduce revenue share, any chance they work together with the Big 12 to throw money at Arkansas to leave the SEC and rejoin the Big 12? That might be a win-win for the two leagues.

Anyway, I’d say more, but I’m like five more things will happen overnight, so what’s the point? Instead, how about some more Lord of the Rings quotes from my Twitter feed:

“There won’t *be* a Pac-16, Pippin.”

“I am a servant of the Pacific Fire, wielder of the flame of Coliseum. Go back to the shadow! Dark fire will not avail you, flame of Bevo!”

“Nine companions. So be it. You shall be the fellowship of the Longhorn.” “Great! Where are we going?”

“Boomer…yes, that’s what they used to call me. Boomer the Sooner. I am Boomer the White. And I come back to you now, at the turn of the tide.”

“You cannot wield it! None of us can! The Longhorn Network answers to Bevo alone.”

DeLoss Dodds: “The Longhorn Network…it’s so heavy.” Dan Beebe: “I can’t carry it for you, Mr. Dodds… BUT I CAN CARRY YOU! C’mon!!”

“Stand, Men of the West! Stand & wait! This is the hour of doom. … The realm of Dan Beebe is ended! The Sooner Schooner has fulfilled its quest.”

“The battle of the Pac-12 is over; the battle for college sports is about to begin.”

Also: “BREAKING: Oklahoma now demanding that the Longhorn Network be taken deep into the heart of Texas, cast back into the fiery chasm from whence it came.”

Oh, and totally unrelated, but also this: “BREAKING: Brett Favre to join Big XII as its tenth member. Will add much-needed stability.” 🙂

P.S. One more LOTR quote, from yesterday… unrelated to the Big 12 or Pac-12, but maybe my favorite yet, because of the reference to the Mountain West’s TV network, The Mtn.:

“So, Boise, you tried to join the MWC. And if that fails, where then will you go? If The Mtn defeats you, will you risk a more dangerous road?”

Conferencepocalypse Now

      18 Comments on Conferencepocalypse Now

“Fell deeds awake! Now for wrath, now for ruin, and an Orange dawn!”

In a stunning development that virtually guarantees #CHAOS and #PANIC on the conference realignment front, Syracuse and Pittsburgh have abandoned the Big East in favor of the ACC. So the ACC is the first conference to reach 14 teams — the SEC presently being stuck in limbo between 12 and 13, as Texas A&M sorts out its legal issues — and the Big East, at least its football side, is suddenly in #ZombieWAC territory, with UConn playing the role of Utah State: the last piece holding the league together. If the Huskies stay, maybe the Big East’s remnants can merge with the Big 12’s remnants, and live to fight another day. If the Huskies bolt, forget about it. UConn and Rutgers to the Big Ten, West Virginia and Louisville to the SEC, TCU back to the Mountain West, South Florida and Cincinnati to Conference USA? The Big East: It’s a DIASPORA!!! Or, to put it in terms of another Lord of the Rings quote:

“My teams are spent. My league has ended. Syracuse has deserted us. Pitt’s betrayed me. Abandon your posts! Flee, flee for your lives!”

Meanwhile, it appears likely the Pac-12 will imminently add Oklahoma and Oklahoma State, and maybe — or by some accounts, almost certainly — Texas and Texas Tech as well, in which case #BrendanLoyPANIC! (From USC in Boulder every other year to USC in Boulder every 8 years? NOOOOOOOO!!!!)

The next few days appear likely to see massive developments all around, and who knows how everything will look when they’re done. Except, you know, crappy.

UPDATE: UConn is reportedly aggressively pursuing ACC membership. So that’ll be it for the Big East as a football league. I doubt Rutgers joins UConn in the ACC, since Syracuse already gives that conference a pretty good NYC market foothold. (I realize Syracuse and New York City are very far apart geographically, but there’s a strong Syracuse alumni and fan base in NYC.) Instead, probably either West Virginia or Louisville joins the ACC as its 16th member, with the other one going to the SEC. Rutgers then pounds on the Big Ten’s door, and with the Big East collapsing, maybe Notre Dame joins them. In that vein, the real question, I suppose, is whether the Big East can keep it together in non-football sports, since that’s all ND needs them for anyway. If they can’t, the Big Ten can certainly afford to go 16, with Notre Dame one of the 16; if they can, and thus ND stays put, I’m not sure the economic rationale is there for the Big Ten to add a collection of four Big East and Big XII castaways. Maybe Rutgers, Kansas, Kansas State and, uh, I dunno, Iowa State?? South Florida?!? (Cincinnati would presumably be vetoed by Ohio State. Maybe they’ll end up in the ACC once the SEC steals one of its power teams along with Missouri from the Big XII?)

Meanwhile, no matter how you look at it, TCU appears to be screwed. But hey, that’s good news for Boise State! If the Mountain West can keep both the Broncos and the Frogs, they’ll be more relevant and can continue to try and push back — with congressional help — against being completely marginalized in football by the superconferences. Even better if Baylor ends up in the Mountain West…

Pac-12 Power Rankings week 2

      1 Comment on Pac-12 Power Rankings week 2

A good week for the Pac-12 who went 8-4, with two losses coming from conference foes. Promising starts for all the North teams but OSU, less so for the South. This weekend serves as a breather for a few teams, but a tough challenge for others. Utah, Washington, Washington State all face their toughest opponents so far this season. How will the Pac-12 measure up in Week 3?

NORTH
1. Stanford (2-0, 0-0 Pac-12)
LW 1

Another easy win against an easy opponent. Andrew Luck was impressive, but how will he and the Cardinal fair against an opponent with a pulse?

2. Oregon (1-1, 0-0)
LW 2

Ducks bounced back from their loss to LSU by pounding Nevada. A virtual bye this week playing FCS foe Missouri State.

3. Washington (2-0, 0-0)
LW 5

Huskies secondary was picked apart by Hawaii just as it was by Eastern Washington the week before, but the Husky offense featuring a monster performance by QB Keith Price powered the Dawgs to another close win. Did I mention the Huskies had a defensive 2 point conversion?

4. Cal (2-0, 0-0)
LW 3

A back and forth battle against Pac 12 South basement team Colorado, with Cal squeaking out a win in OT isn’t exactly a confidence booster for the Bears, but its still a 2-0 start.

5. Washington State (2-0, 0-0)
LW 5

Cougars fans are feeling good with a 2-0 start for the first time in years, but WSU’s opponents make Stanford’s look tough. Will they be able to win against a foe that can fight back?

6. Oregon State (0-2, 0-0)
LW 6

After an embarassing close lose to FCS Sacramento State the Beavers just rolled over and played dead for Wisconsin who shut out Oregon State. A home game against struggling UCLA gives them a shot to turn things around.

SOUTH
1. ASU (2-0, 0-0)
LW 2

It wasn’t a pretty win, the two teams contributed for 23 total penalties, but it was a win against a ranked opponent and QB Brock Osweiler had an outstanding performance with 43 completions for over 600 yards and 5 TDs. Still one has to wonder if the Sun Devil’s sloppy play will catch up to them.

2. USC (2-0, 0-0)
LW 1

The Trojans game against the Utes, the first Pac 12 game ever, was closer than he final score indicated, a score that didn’t even become set until two hours after the game. This is still not the dominant USC of the past decade.

3. Utah (1-1, 0-0)
LW 3

Like I said the game was closer than the final score would indicate, the Trojans scoring as the clock expired to extend the lead. The Utes showed they can compete in a Pac-12 game, now can they start winning them?

4. Arizona (1-1, 0-0)
LW 4

Arizona didn’t stand a chance in this game after being shut out 21-0 in the first quarter. Now its home games against the top two Pac-12 teams Stanford and Oregon. Rough way to start the year for the Wildcats.

5. UCLA (1-1, 0-0)
LW 5

An unimpressive win against an unimpressive team. The Spartans of San Jose State were in the game til the end. A mere 43,000 fans made it out to the game. Win or no, Rick Neuheisal is sitting on the hottest seat in the conference right now.

6. Colorado (0-2, 0-0)
LW 6

A near win may be a move in the right direction for the beleaguered Buffalo but its still not an actual win. So far Colorado looks the same in its new home as it did in its old home. When will this former power return to glory? Not this year, thats for sure.

ACC, Pac-12/14/16 consider “pod” setup

      21 Comments on ACC, Pac-12/14/16 consider “pod” setup

The Austin American-Statesman‘s latest update on conference realignment reveals that Oklahoma is apparently dead-set on going west to the Pac-12, but Texas is still weighing three options: Pac-12, ACC, or independence. None of that is hugely shocking if you’ve been following this story, but this nugget is very important:

The ACC is willing to talk about a unique conference format that has intrigued Texas. Instead of divisions, the conference could be divided into four pods, with each pod containing four teams, to aid scheduling. …

[T]he Pac-12 has been in discussions about using a pod system as a way to divide the conference too. … Texas isn’t in love with the thought of playing in a division that includes none of the Los Angeles-based teams.

But [pod scheduling is] not what’s on the table right now.

“Texas really isn’t happy with the way the Pac-12 would like to align the conference,” a well-placed source said. “They want to put all the former Pac-8 schools in one division and group all the former Big 12 schools (assuming Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas and Texas Tech join) with Utah and the Arizona schools.”

Texas wants to be in the same division as UCLA and Southern Cal, which would be tougher, but it would also guarantee the Longhorns a trip to Los Angeles every year. Think recruiting.

Everyone will want to be in the same division as UCLA and USC, including Colorado, Utah and the Arizona schools, who — if they vote as a bloc — have the ability to block expansion altogether if they know they’re going to be ghettoized into the Pac-16 East (a.k.a. the Big XII Leftover Division). Texas, of course, can also single-handedly “block” further expansion (at least from 14 to 16) if they’re unhappy with the proposed divisional setup, by simply declining to join. So I really think this issue is underrated as a stumbling block on the road to the Pac-Superconference.

That said, whereas some sort of elaborate “pod” system might be attractive to the ACC as a way out of its confusing “Atlantic” and “Coastal” divisions (the setup that served as a cautionary tale which convinced the Pac-12’s Larry Scott not to adopt “zipper divisions” in the first place), the Pac-12 is going to be more skeptical. Still, as I suggested on David’s post, I think some form of pod system — either with conference semifinals, or a stupid situation where you get two “division” champions without everybody having played everybody else — is ultimately what will happen if the Pac-12 expands to 16, because resistance to the East/West split from the non-Pac-8 schools will just be too great to overcome.

If the Pac-12 just expands to 14… I don’t know. You could conceivably force Utah into the North to make room for the Oklahomas in the South; the Utes alone can’t stop expansion, and they arguably have the least room to complain, having just been airlifted into the BCS by virtue of their Pac-12 invite. But that would also make the divisions look awfully unbalanced competitively (once USC recovers from sanctions, anyway), disturbingly like the old Big 12 North/South split, especially if you assume that Stanford will soon fall to earth and Oregon isn’t going to be a Top 5 team forever (as those programs’ histories tend to suggest). Meanwhile, just as importantly if not moreso, this solution would massively reduce the entire North division’s L.A. access and/or force the end of the double California cross-division games, unless the conference regular-season schedule is expanded to 10 games, which seems implausible. So I’m just not sure how that would play out.

Ultimately, structurally, I really think 16-team superconferences, and probably 14-team ones as well, require some sort of pod system to work. Otherwise they aren’t really conferences at all, just two loosely affiliated 7- or 8-team divisions. But how you then fairly determine a champion becomes very tricky.

CotW: Reflecting on September 11th

      7 Comments on CotW: Reflecting on September 11th

I was planning to have this done by this morning. As you can see, things did not go as planned.

Part of it, most of it I suppose, is that while I have lots of thoughts about September 11, 2001 kicking around my brain, they don’t easily line up into any sort of easy narrative to be placed on the page. I have lots of observations and so very little structure. I was honestly tempted to just scrap the whole thing and just put up a piece about Superman maybe using an abbreviation for taking the Lord’s name in vain. But that felt like a cop out, like letting myself off the hook a bit too easy. No worries though, you’ll still be able to read how I feel about that whole Superman thing later in the week.

In any case, please bear in mind my remarkable lack of cohesion in putting this together and do your best to be kind if it all feels a bit…jumpy.

In reviewing the article I wrote on the 11th and the few days that followed (which was reprinted here on Friday) I was surprised by what I do and do not remember from those days. The details…they slip away. I had forgotten about the heartbreaking makeshift signs proclaiming a solidarity that proved ever so fleeting, even more fleeting than most of America probably realized. The bomb threats, the phone call from my professor…those I had blanked on as well. Hell, I cannot even remember watching the footage live. I know I did, I must have. We were locked down, we had nothing to do but stare glassy eyed at our TV sets or try our useless phones. But I don’t remember any of it.

The feeling of it I can recall instantly. The weird conflict of wanting to just hide running up against the desire to be out there doing something, doing anything, because, well, damn, those were my cities burning on the television.

I do remember that one plane and how such an innocuous sound could be so staggering, so frightening. I remember chasing down rumors about old friends and classmates who might have been at Ground Zero and finding, thankfully, none were real. And I remember talking to my dad and finding that people he knew and worked with were there and feeling profoundly unequipped to say anything about these people I never met, that my dad probably did not know very well, who when nonetheless found ourselves missing.

In DC, September 11 became a season that blanketed the city. In actuality, the Pentagon is across a sizable body of water from DC. For most residents, there was no real threat at all. What came after was when things really began for us. The bomb threats. The anthrax. The anthrax scares. I was evacuated from where I was interning twice for suspicious packages that, thankfully, came to nothing. People interning for Senators and Representatives had to find new office spaces when the packages they received turned out not to be so empty.

My then girlfriend, now wife, had a roommate who only left the room for class and internship and spent the rest of her time relentlessly writing about her day for what she claimed was going to be a book about living in DC during those days. I look back now and realize she was very likely wrestling with what my DSM-IV refers to as Acute Stress Disorder.

And yet…I loved DC. I loved my time at American. I met my wife and now, ten years later, we have a new baby daughter. I met people who I wish I kept in better touch with me because they were great. Fun, smart, energetic…we went to class everyday and internship everyday despite what had happened, what was happening. We walked past men with guns on our way to Starbucks, we attended basement raves near hotels that let people on to the roof to see the smoldering remains of the Pentagon. I wish September 11 never happened, but I can hardly imagine my life without it. And I imagine I am hardly the only one. For good or for ill, for ten years it has been an event that many, maybe most, of us wove tightly into our clothes, our skin, our souls.

So understand when I say this I mean no disrespect. I am so ready to be done with September 11. I think we should continue to honor and mourn the heroes. I think we should build monuments to their bravery and as an affront to the hateful barbarism of that day. But I am ready to put it in the past. I have no desire for this to become my generation’s Vietnam, not in terms of an intractable war but in terms of it being the cloud that hangs over every election for years. We did a lot right after September 11 and we did a lot wrong. I know this and while you may disagree about what falls on the right and wrong sides of the equation, I imagine most of you do too.

But I don’t want to fight those battles ad nauseum. We lost so much that day, I want to be done feeding that wound. We need to stop pretending that we get the difference between people who are Christian and do terrible things and Christians in general but that we cannot seem to make our minds do the same when it comes to Muslims. We need to stop doing things to make ourselves feel safer when they don’t actually make us safer at all. We need to learn the difference between casting off naiveté and embracing suspicious cynicism.

That’s my small prayer, I suppose. Or hope, if the idea of prayer makes you uncomfortable. That we can mourn without holding on. That we can remember without reliving. That we can stop thinking of the day in the context of horror and start remembering it as a day, a time, of heroes. Because “moving on” is not forgetting. Moving on is realizing that we have as much a responsibility to the living that survived as we do to the brave that did not.

When my daughter, two months tomorrow, asks about September 11, as I am sure she will, I will tell her what happened. We will talk about terrorism and loss and ramifications that echoed for years. Because it is important to be honest about these things. But I will also tell her about college hallways filled with classmates comforting one another despite not knowing each other even a month. I will tell her about giving blood. I will tell her about men and women who ran towards fire and ash and broken concrete. I will tell her about people who tried to do something, anything, because, well, damn, those were our cities.

Ten years later

      Comments Off on Ten years later

IMG_9749

Depending on your time zone, it is, or soon will be, September 11, 2011 — ten years since the atrocity. Above is a photo of the Jason Dahl memorial in the Ken Caryl section of Littleton. The pilot of United 93 was living in Ken Caryl in September 2001, and there’s a nice little roadside memorial in his honor. I took the girls there this afternoon, and we left flowers and a flag.

Speaking of United 93, you absolutely must read this Washington Post story about the pilots who were tasked with bringing that plane down if necessary.

Anyway… I’ve set up a special homepage for the day, but for those who click through to this post, here are a few links:

• A full account of my memories of September 11, 2001, written up last year for my “Defining Days of the Decade” series.

• My wake-up call from Becky on 9/11.

• My montage of speeches about 9/11 set to the “Battle Hymn of the Republic.”

• The USC Daily Trojan‘s online collection of the USC community’s stories of 9/11. I submitted, and they published, an excerpt from my “Defining Days” post — and now I feel very old, as it’s surrounded by accounts of current USC students who were in elementary school on 9/11.

• Photos of NYC on the second anniversary of 9/11, when I shot the “Tribute in Light” picture in the blog’s current masthead.

• Photos of my June 3, 2001 trip to the WTC — exactly 100 days before 9/11.

pic10722

pic10670

Never forget.

CotW-Reprinting September 11th

      Comments Off on CotW-Reprinting September 11th

What follows below the jump is the piece I wrote after September 11th for the Connecticut College Voice. I was in DC at the time, studying at American University for the Semester in Washington Program, and sent this story in to the paper via email.

It ran in the September 14th edition of the Voice, as it was/is a weekly paper. I had my notes, but was unable to find my original file of it amongst my digital archives. But thanks to the Voice and current editor-in-chief Jazmine Hughes, I was able to get my hands on a scan of the paper. It appears here almost exactly as it did there, except for minor grammatical changes and the inclusion of a moment involving a military plane that appeared in my notes but for some reason (probably length) did not make the final copy.

My plan is to reprint this today as a visit to the past, and then to write “September 11, ten years on” on Monday as a look to today and, hopefully a future where it is less raw.

Continue reading