“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” an odious and indefensible policy of intentional and irrational discrimination whose repeal is supported by large majorities of voters, soldiers, and members of Congress, as well as the president / commander-in-chief and the leaders of the military itself, nevertheless remains the law of the land — likely for an indefinite period of time into the future, or until the courts strike it down, in which case opponents can again dodge the substance of the issue and make it all about “judicial activism” — because 1) Harry Reid is an idiot, and 2) “moderate” Republican “supporters” of repeal care more about stupid Beltway procedural games, ego battles and other such assorted bulls**t than securing civil rights for American soldiers in uniform who happen to love members of the same sex, and 3) Republican opponents will block any further attempt at passage because, uh, tax cuts are more important, or something, and 4) Harry Reid is an idiot.
Look, if you oppose repeal of DADT on principle, fine. I vehemently disagree, but I respect your opinion, no matter how wrong I feel it is. All I ask is that you state your stance forthrightly, that you “own” your opinion, or what some might call your bigotry. Own it, stand up for it, defend it. Fine. What I don’t respect is saying you “support” repeal, yet holding it hostage for procedural reasons in some sort of stupid game of legislative chicken. And yet also, with that having been said, God help Harry Reid if he could have gotten this thing passed with a few minor concessions to those procedural hostage-holders, yet decided to bull ahead because he wanted to make a political point, or because he’s an incompetent ass, or both. Every game of chicken has at least two players, after all, and they all deserve to rot for letting unrelated stupid nonsense decide the fate of this important issue.
UPDATE: But wait!!! Joementum to the rescue?!?